It is a line that would sound like a compliment in Treviso and like a provocation almost anywhere else, and Mario of Pillole Ovali delivers it without hesitating: Benetton is not one city’s team, it is the country’s team.
Benetton Treviso is far more than the Treviso side: it is the Italian side.
Why Benetton carries so much weight
The reason, for Mario, is also earned: over the years the club has won first pick of the best players and become the backbone of the national team. The result is that a supporter in Bari or Naples, with no side of his own in the URC, ends up identifying with Treviso’s green much as he does with Italy’s blue.
And if that were a problem?
Here DanPat pumps the brakes, and the counterpoint is the most interesting part of the exchange. Benetton is not Zebre: it is a private structure that answers to investors, sponsors and above all to its own city. Treating it as a federal selection means forgetting who pays the bills and who the club has to face on a Sunday.
The example is Tommaso Menoncello, used in a season in which the club had gone all in on the European cup, with the city paying tribute to him in his last match before his move to Toulouse. That bond – club, city, player – is not sentimental decoration: it is the reason a club side exists at all.
Two needs living side by side
Italian rugby needs Benetton to develop internationals; Benetton needs to win for its own people. As long as those two things overlap, nobody notices the tension. The moment they diverge – a rotation, a cup priority, a player being managed – is when Italian rugby discovers it depends on a single club for almost everything.
It is not a criticism of Benetton. It is a snapshot of a system that would need more than one shoulder to lean on.
Read also: The best Italy XV and the 2031 horizon · The Miotti case: meritocracy or the value of the system? · all news
The full podcast is on the DanPat Rugby YouTube channel.
DANPAT Rugby
